Legal Ethics in Singapore

Legal Ethics Laws, regulations and codes of conduct attempts to define standards of behaviour for lawyers in society. They form an important per centum of the jurisdictions regulatory process. These laws and codes of conduct demand a certain standard in which legal professionals should adhere to in their professional and private lives. It likewise represents a standard of respectable behaviour defined by legislators and professional bodies. In Singapore, there are a number of primary sources of legal ethics. The pursuance are the main sources of legal ethics * The Legal Profession Act Subsidiary legislation * Practice directions from the courts * Practice directions form the Law Society * legal decisions and opinions on legal ethics Lawyers are bound to these laws and regulation and must adhere to them diligently so as to not straw away from ethical behaviour or to a harsher extent of being banned from practising law in Singapore. In essence, a lawyers debt instrument can be ca tegorized into two main groups. They are the lawyers (I) duty to the court and (ii) duty to the client. The tables below explain briefly, the various duties lawyers have to the court and to their clients.Lawyers duty to the Court Duty Explanation Truthfulness in Court Rule 2(2) A Professional Conduct Rules- Must not mislead the court state to Clients Conduct Responsible for clients conduct and representation of the case Honoring Undertaking to the Court A Lawyers word must be his bond Respect for the Court Lawyer conduct must be consistent with standing, dignity & authority of the court debt instrument in Assisting Administrative Justice Lawyers are officers of the court Lawyers duty to the ClientDuty Explanation Honesty Honesty in all(a) dealings with the client Diligence & Competence Lawyer is expected to exercise necessary skills and diligently apply himself to the case Confidentiality Obligation to maintain confidentiality of all intercourse between him and client Conflict of Interest Lawyers conduct must not be influenced by personal or private interests A lawyers challenge is to balance his responsibilities to assist the court with his duty to look after the best interest of his client.In essence, his duty to the administration of nicety is weighed higher than the duty he has to his client. However, it brings about a concern for lawyers when defending their clients. This can be seen in situations in where a lawyer has to exercise his perspicaciousness in introducing evidence to the court. If the lawyer does not exercise his judgement in the favour of the court, he is putting his client at a disadvantage. Therefore it is highly important that a lawyer does adhere to his duty to the court without compromising the position or case of his in any way for it to be preferential for all parties.